I saw it replied to it too.
It's a smart-ass showing it successfully blocking a threat and then just saying that it doesn't work.
What that person over on wilders did is they showed a prompt where SAP successfully blocked it and prompted the user about it, and then the "tester" allowed it.
Clearly your assumptions aren't true. It doesn't matter what i clicked in this scenario (i clicked block) my files were still encrypted. Blame the test bed to defend your favoured program does not help improve it instead will keep it stagnant.
Calling me a "smart ass" doesn't validate for the program's failure to protect the system given the sample was fairly well detected by other vendors. Why would i try to poison the test? I have nothing to gain from a bias tests.
Its due to approach like this from users like you people feel discouraged to report genuine issues. At the end of the day, if such problems are reported and fixed its only end users who will gain protection. So now tell me why are you trying to defend SecureAPlus knowing it could potentially become a determinant to your own protection? Are you guys that ignorant?
